Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kathy Hentcy's avatar

Beautiful writing. Thank you for sharing the play. Am I the only one who reads this as a story about narcissism? I was disappointed by Vargas’ congratulations to Sonny at the end for that reason. Am I too ... literal? Not sure what the word would be.

Expand full comment
Sam Redlark's avatar

After Chekov's gun is fired, if a story has any horizon beyond that moment, then the focus is on those who remain behind, who must pick up their lives and carry on as best they can.

Chekov's dick pic, in common with a real dick, is a more complex proposition, with a wider and more unpredictable area of effect, and the ability to resurface at any time, like a flesh-toned Excalibur, and spread more ripples. In the play it has the power to beget Chekov's knife, which is alluded to, and is quieter than any gun as it slips out of the darkness. It can destabilise social frameworks and create odd pairings where, for example, an adult friend your own age can end up having an intimate conversation with your daughter, while his emotionally reserved wife shares her thoughts with you in an unguarded moment.

In an of itself, it is as ridiculous as any picture of a penis. What it symbolises to different people can gather some truly dark and wayward momentum.

The play has an interesting dynamic – two tiers of prime movers – a pair of men on stage, and another larger group of never-to-be-seen women occupying some theoretical space elsewhere; the actions of each group influencing the other, then being recapped for the benefit of the audience.

The lines regarding parents being afraid of their own children brought to mind Battle Royale (which was first a novel and then a movie – I believe that it has also been adapted into a manga twice). Some people (I would be among them) believe that it strongly influenced The Hunger Games, though the author of those books denies this.

Battle Royale looks towards a dystopian Japan, where the youth are out of control and the adults have resorted to violence and terrorism to bludgeon them into submission. Every year a random class of teenagers is deposited on an island, fitted with explosive collars, and ordered to fight to the death. Some choose to kill themselves; some band together knowing that these unions are untenable in the long-term; a pair of psychopaths gleefully chalk up high body counts.

Tagged onto the end of the Director's Cut of the film, there is a dream sequence: A girl from the island is walking along the edge of an estuarial river with her former teacher. He was not a good man. The girl tells him that she kept the knife that another pupil once used to stab him. This was the incident that pushed the beleaguered teacher over the edge.

He tells her: “What do you think a grown-up should say to a kid now?”

It's such a sledgehammer line of dialogue - an adult admitting that he has absolutely no idea how to set a good example of what a responsible grown-up should be. It sums up the theme of the film so perfectly that I don't understand why it was left out of the more widely available theatrical cut.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts